Re: [PATCH] s_lock support for win32

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s_lock support for win32
Date: 2004-07-10 01:20:57
Message-ID: 1321.1089422457@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Manfred Spraul wrote:
>> But what about my libpq patch? Races in the library startup just ask for
>> corruptions.

> Yes, I saw the thread locking patch and will be applying that soon.

Has this been agreed to by the win32-hackers list? My recollection is
that there was still considerable disagreement about the appropriate
way to deal with this issue.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-10 01:32:20 Re: [PATCH] s_lock support for win32
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2004-07-09 23:55:07 Re: ResultSerMetaData.getColumnDisplaySize() with timestamp