Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...

From: Leonardo Francalanci <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Date: 2010-10-29 17:22:12
Message-ID: 131872.8446.qm@web29013.mail.ird.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hmm, maybe I spoke too soon. With 9000 child tables I get a profile
> like this:

Well, the 9000-table-test-case was meant to check the difference in
performance with/without the patch... I don't see the reason for trying
to optimize such an unrealistic case.

BTW can someone explain to me which are the cases where the
patch actually helps?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-29 17:31:32 Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-29 17:16:44 Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...