| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: uncataloged tables are a vestigial husk |
| Date: | 2012-06-13 17:22:39 |
| Message-ID: | 13178.1339608159@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> The attached patch cleans it up by removing RELKIND_UNCATALOGED and
>>> teaching RelationBuildLocalRelation() to set the relkind itself.
>> I think there are probably some places to fix in the docs too.
> catalogs.sgml doesn't include it in the list of possible relkinds,
> since it never hits the disk. And grep -i uncatalog doc/src/sgml
> comes up empty. Where else should I be looking?
Huh. Okay, there probably isn't anyplace then. I'm surprised we didn't
list it in catalogs.sgml, though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2012-06-13 17:24:29 | Re: [RFC][PATCH] Logical Replication/BDR prototype and architecture |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-06-13 17:22:36 | Is cachedFetchXidStatus provably valid? |