Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line
Date: 2019-11-07 17:02:04
Message-ID: 13167.1573146124@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 02:47:55PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Pushed a patch going with the former. Let's see what the buildfarm
>> says...

> Thanks Andres. On a rather related note, would it make sense to do
> the same for regression and isolation tests in our in-core modules?

I don't think it'd be a great idea to change parallel_schedule like
that. Independently adding test scripts to the same parallel batch
probably won't end well: you might end up over the concurrency limit,
or the scripts might conflict through sharing table names or the like.
So I'd rather see that there's a conflict to worry about.

Anyway, merge conflicts there aren't so common IME.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2019-11-07 17:04:32 plpythonu -> python3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-11-07 16:50:25 Re: SKIP_LOCKED test causes random buildfarm failures