From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RFC: split OBJS lines to one object per line |
Date: | 2019-11-07 17:02:04 |
Message-ID: | 13167.1573146124@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 02:47:55PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Pushed a patch going with the former. Let's see what the buildfarm
>> says...
> Thanks Andres. On a rather related note, would it make sense to do
> the same for regression and isolation tests in our in-core modules?
I don't think it'd be a great idea to change parallel_schedule like
that. Independently adding test scripts to the same parallel batch
probably won't end well: you might end up over the concurrency limit,
or the scripts might conflict through sharing table names or the like.
So I'd rather see that there's a conflict to worry about.
Anyway, merge conflicts there aren't so common IME.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2019-11-07 17:04:32 | plpythonu -> python3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-11-07 16:50:25 | Re: SKIP_LOCKED test causes random buildfarm failures |