Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?

Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié sep 21 00:27:53 -0300 2011:
>
> On tis, 2011-09-20 at 11:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > +1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do
> > > > such a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed
> > > > lists for appropriate purposes.
> > >
> > > Well, that much we've already decided a few years ago. The
> > > blocking issues are: (1) do we have enough interest, and (2) where
> > > to put it (I'm looking at you, pgfoundry).
> >
> > I don't see why we wouldn't put it in @postgresql.org.
>
> One nice thing about pgfoundry would be the document manager. Also, at
> least at some point in the past, a pgfoundry project was easier to
> manage than getting anything done about a @postgresql.org mailing list.

The document manager might be useful, true. I cannot speak about past
administrators of the Majordomo installation that serves the
@postgresql.org lists, though. For all intents and purposes, it seems
I'm in charge of it now.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support