From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | "pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Fix the removing of an inherited table |
Date: | 2011-09-19 19:48:58 |
Message-ID: | 1316461738.2114.41.camel@localhost.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:28 -0500, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:10 -0500, Dave Page wrote:
> >> That doesn't seem right - the user shouldn't see quoting, except in SQL
> >> queries.
> >>
> >
> > We show the user the schema and the table names. It would be weird to
> > display foo.bar.something if the schema name is foo.bar and the table
> > name is something. We could use two columns, of course, but I don't
> > really see the point.
> >
> > Anyway, it was already displayed that way. I just fixed the issue. So,
> > if you want to fix the display, be my guest :)
>
> My point is that you haven't actually fixed the original bug; you've
> made it worse by further propagating the original issue.
>
So, what should we do? display two columns? how will that work on the
combobox?
I agree to work on this once we've found a good way to deal with it, but
we don't have one right now. And actually, the current patch fixes the
OP's issue, and that's good enough for me.
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Begina Felicysym | 2011-09-19 20:27:50 | Re: Polish pgAdmin website translation |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-09-19 19:28:02 | Re: pgAdmin III commit: Fix the removing of an inherited table |