From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Couple document fixes |
Date: | 2011-09-06 01:07:29 |
Message-ID: | 1315271205-sup-7449@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from David Fetter's message of lun sep 05 21:05:10 -0300 2011:
> On brief inspection, it appears that each of these would be better
> served, at least functionally, with some kind of enumerated type.
> Might it be worth trying to micro-optimize this case for a one-byte
> enum? Or maybe something like the varvarlena pattern?
What would be the point? It works pretty well already. It doesn't need
fixing.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | lsliang | 2011-09-06 02:43:57 | about value storage |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2011-09-06 00:05:10 | Re: Couple document fixes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-09-06 02:08:22 | Re: Shared invalidation cache messages for temporary tables |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-09-06 00:19:21 | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem |