From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Couple document fixes |
Date: | 2011-09-05 18:36:21 |
Message-ID: | 1315247626-sup-3192@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun sep 05 15:21:46 -0300 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Discussed the idea a bit on IM with Bruce, but couldn't find any really
> > good alternative. Idea floated so far:
> >
> > * byte (seems pretty decent to me)
> > * octet (though maybe people would expect it'd output as a number)
> > * char1 (looks ugly, but then we have int4 and so on)
> > * achar (this one is just plain weird)
> >
> > None seems great. Thoughts?
>
> Any new ideas on how to document our "char" data type?
I think part of the problem is that this only seems to bother patch
developers, and only until they become aware of the issue. After that,
it just becomes a known gotcha that's easy to work around. Thus,
there's not much interest in spending a lot of time fixing it.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-09-05 19:08:44 | Re: documenting contrib modules (was Re: Building PDFs error) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-09-05 18:21:46 | Re: Couple document fixes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-09-05 18:42:31 | Re: remove useless ccache searching |
Previous Message | Andy Colson | 2011-09-05 18:29:55 | Re: remove useless ccache searching |