Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings
Date: 2011-08-12 19:09:55
Message-ID: 1313176195.14095.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2011-08-12 at 11:46 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> I figure there might be warnings you haven't seen if you haven't been
> building with bonjour, perl, openssl, pam, libxml, or ossp-uuid, so
> I've attached the output.

We have a build farm member (smew) that covers all of that except
bonjour, but I can confirm that there are no additional warnings on
account of that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-08-12 19:10:51 Re: Further news on Clang - spurious warnings
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-08-12 18:59:21 Re: Change format of FDW options used in \d* commands (was: Re: per-column FDW options, v5)