From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Compiler warnings with stringRelOpts (was WIP: Fast GiST index build) |
Date: | 2011-08-08 19:11:46 |
Message-ID: | 1312830351-sup-2573@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Alexander Korotkov's message of lun ago 08 13:21:17 -0400 2011:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>wrote:
>
> > An array of relopt_string? Isn't that a bit strange? If I recall
> > correctly, the point of this was to be able to allocate the
> > relopt_string struct and the char array itself as a single palloc unit,
> > in a single call somewhere in the reloptions API (which was convoluted
> > in some points precisely to let the string case work). I don't have the
> > details of this fresh in my mind though. It certainly worked with more
> > than one string option when I committed it, IIRC.
> >
> Yes, it seems strange. But it also seems that both were added by your commit
> of table-based parser:
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=ba748f7a11ef884277b61d1708a17a44acfd1736
Oh, you're adding options directly to stringRelOpts? Hmm, I can't
remember whether I tried to do that; I have memory of testing string
options via add_string_reloption ... and in reflection, it seems obvious
that it would fail.
Perhaps the easiest way to fix it is as you suggest, by declaring the
struct to take a pointer rather than the value directly. Not sure how
to make both cases work sanely; the add_string_reloption path will need
updates. I don't have time to work on it right now though.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian Pflug | 2011-08-08 19:43:01 | Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-08-08 17:50:38 | Re: fstat vs. lseek |