From: | Michael Graham <mgraham(at)bloxx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks |
Date: | 2011-08-03 14:35:02 |
Message-ID: | 1312382102.24461.61.camel@brutus |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 09:03 -0500, Andy Colson wrote:
> Depending on how long you ran your test, and the conf settings, and
> the size of your database, autovacuum may never have even tried.
I know that the vacuum is definitely running (in fact isn't it the
vacuum that set the reltuples to 0?), the test was running for a number
of weeks but this is the first time it has emptied the queue.
> You can take a look on pg_stat_all_tables, under the *vacuum columns,
> to see if it ever even ran. (a date in last_autovacuum would indicate
> a successful run, it wont show failures). It should, however, write
> something to the system log. I recall something like "autovacuum
> canceled because...something or other" type a message.
Yeah it said it last ran yesterday (and is currently running now), but I
did I notice in the log:
2011-08-02 19:43:35 BST ERROR: canceling autovacuum task
2011-08-02 19:43:35 BST CONTEXT: automatic vacuum of table
"traffic.public.logdata5queue"
Which is interesting if not particularly useful.
> While you are running a test, you could keep an eye on the log to see
> if you get any of those messages. I think that would indicate
> autovacuum could not get a lock. You can also watch pg_stat_activity
> during the test, current_query will show you what table is being
> vacuumed.
I'm pretty certain the autovacuumer is running while the test is on
going what I can't work out is under what circumstances it will be able
to return unused space to the OS in when it can't.
Cheers,
--
Michael Graham <mgraham(at)bloxx(dot)com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Graham | 2011-08-03 14:57:25 | Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks |
Previous Message | Sergey Konoplev | 2011-08-03 14:32:58 | Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks |