From: | MirrorX <mirrorx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | weird table sizes |
Date: | 2011-07-23 18:29:48 |
Message-ID: | 1311445788836-4626505.post@n5.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
hello to all
i would like your help in the following matter ->
we have 2 identical databases. the 1st was built from scratch while the 2nd
was 'restored' from a dump of another database (without the data). so the
sequences for instance on the 2nd started from very big numbers. in these
databases there is a table. in the first it has around 350 mil rows and size
of 65GB (sequence started from 1). in the second it has 250 mil and size of
430 GB(sequence started from 9 billions). how can that be?the sizes are from
the pg_relation_size function.
i know that with what i said you certainly cannot answer to my question but
i dont know what kind of extra info you would like to know in order to help
me, so i can provide you anything you find useful.
i would appreciate it if you could point me to some direction.thank you in
advance
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/weird-table-sizes-tp4626505p4626505.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2011-07-23 18:44:08 | Re: streaming replication does not work across datacenter with 20ms latency? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-07-23 18:25:19 | Re: streaming replication does not work across datacenter with 20ms latency? |