Re: ERROR: functions in index expression must be marked IMMUTABLE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>, "Sven R(dot) Kunze" <srkunze(at)mail(dot)de>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ERROR: functions in index expression must be marked IMMUTABLE
Date: 2017-02-26 17:42:16
Message-ID: 13105.1488130936@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> On 02/26/2017 08:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not entirely sure why the OP feels he needs an index on this
>> expression. If he's willing to restrict the column to have the
>> exact format 'YYYY-MM-DD', then a regular textual index would sort
>> the same anyway. Perhaps what's needed is just to add a CHECK
>> constraint verifying that the column has that format.

> The OP is trying to create an index on the value of a jsonb key. Would
> the above still apply or am I misunderstanding the reference to column?

Sure, I was using "column" loosely to refer to the meta->>'birthdate'
expression.

> The below works:
> test=> create index docs_birthdate_idx ON docs using btree
> ((meta->>'birthdate'));
> CREATE INDEX
> So if the text values of 'birthdate' are consistent the index would work
> without the cast?

Yeah, seems to me you could do things like
... WHERE meta->>'birthdate' > '2017-02-26'
and it would Just Work, though I'd admit there's a deficiency of sanity
checking for the RHS constant in this example.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2017-02-26 20:19:49 Re: ERROR: functions in index expression must be marked IMMUTABLE
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2017-02-26 17:32:53 Re: ERROR: functions in index expression must be marked IMMUTABLE