From: | Wim Bertels <wim(dot)bertels(at)khleuven(dot)be> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | plpgsql and prep statements (performance and sql injection) |
Date: | 2011-07-06 09:11:37 |
Message-ID: | 1309943497.2333.43.camel@zwerfkat |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hallo,
good reasons to use prep statements
seem
- performance
- some sql injection defence
but when i look at plpgsql
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/plpgsql-implementation.html
i see that sql statements are translated into prep statements,
and live (the plan) as long the db connection is open
so there seems nothing to be gained from using
prep statements inside a plpgsql function,
the only reason could be the lifecycle of the prep statements
(which u don't really control for the translated sql functions inside
plpgsql functions). So i would be nice to have an extra feature in
plpgsql functions like imm,sta,vol (planning) but then to control the
duration/lifetime of the translated statements inside the plpgsql
function.
also,
since the keyword 'EXECUTE' is ambivalent i don't see at this point how
u can execute a prep statement inside a plpgsql function.
Comments?
mvg,
Wim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-07-06 09:29:47 | Re: plpgsql and prep statements (performance and sql injection) |
Previous Message | BangarRaju Vadapalli | 2011-07-06 08:57:53 | Performance Monitoring of PostGRE |