| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nicholas Bott <zordiac(at)zordiac(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Executing dynamic queries without functions / procedures |
| Date: | 2007-05-12 03:58:38 |
| Message-ID: | 13099.1178942318@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Nicholas Bott <zordiac(at)zordiac(dot)com> writes:
> I would like to use the PL language in conjunction with conditional
> statements, outside of a procedure or function. This doesn't seem to be
> possible from what I've read so far and I wanted to confirm.
Correct.
> Also, if it's not natively possible - is there some kind of hack? For
> example, creating temporary procedures to establish the same result,
> then removing them periodically?
That's basically what you've got to do. There've been discussions on
and off about providing a direct command to execute an anonymous,
transient PL function definition, along the lines of
PERFORM 'begin
... blah blah ...
end'
LANGUAGE plpgsql;
but no one's really put forward a complete plan to deal with this
(what about arguments and a return value?).
Note that there is approximately 0 interest in promoting any one
PL to the exclusion of others, so a command syntax that presumes
which PL is to be executed isn't going to happen any time soon.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dusan PESL | 2007-05-12 08:26:17 | problem - group by |
| Previous Message | Nicholas Bott | 2007-05-11 23:45:29 | Executing dynamic queries without functions / procedures |