| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thunder <thunder1(at)126(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Kuntal Ghosh" <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PANIC :Call AbortTransaction when transaction id is no normal |
| Date: | 2019-05-14 03:28:51 |
| Message-ID: | 13093.1557804531@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[ please don't top-post on the PG lists ]
Thunder <thunder1(at)126(dot)com> writes:
> At 2019-05-14 07:53:36, "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 09:37:32AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> But ... that code's been like that for decades and nobody's complained
>>> before. Why are we worried about bootstrap's response to signals at all?
> On our server when process crash and core dump file generated we will receive complaining phone call.
> That's why i try to fix it.
OK, that's fair. The SIG_DFL change I suggested will fix that problem
for SIGINT etc (except SIGQUIT, for which you should be *expecting*
a core file). I agree with Michael that we do not wish to change what
happens for an internal error; but external signals do not represent
a bug in PG, so forcing a PANIC for those seems unwarranted.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-05-14 03:29:59 | Re: VACUUM can finish an interrupted nbtree page split -- is that okay? |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2019-05-14 03:18:20 | Re: VACUUM can finish an interrupted nbtree page split -- is that okay? |