Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Date: 2021-04-23 13:15:02
Message-ID: 1308811.1619183702@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm curious. The FmgrBuiltin struct includes the "strict" flag, so
> that would "lock down the value" of the strict flag, wouldn't it?

It does, but that's much more directly a property of the function's
C code than parallel-safety is.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Pyhalov 2021-04-23 13:29:07 Re: CTE push down
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-04-23 12:42:06 Re: convert elog(LOG) calls to ereport