| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Indication of db-shared tables |
| Date: | 2011-06-22 06:12:22 |
| Message-ID: | 1308723116-sup-3180@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Greg Sabino Mullane's message of mié jun 22 03:24:34 UTC 2011:
>
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> > Do we do enough to show which tables are db shared, e.g. pg_database? I
> > don't see any indication from psql \dS. Are our docs clear enough?
>
> I don't think \dS should be indicating such a thing. I think it's documented
> well enough: if you are doing something that it matters enough which
> tables are shared, you really oughtta know about them anyway.
Yeah. The user can't create new ones either, so why would it matter?
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-06-22 06:58:02 | Re: Coding style point: "const" in function parameter declarations |
| Previous Message | David Christensen | 2011-06-22 06:03:39 | Re: WIP pgindent replacement |