Re: PATCH: CreateComments: use explicit indexing for ``values''

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: richhguard-monotone <richhguard-monotone(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: CreateComments: use explicit indexing for ``values''
Date: 2011-06-14 14:20:41
Message-ID: 1308061154-sup-6995@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from richhguard-monotone's message of lun jun 13 16:10:17 -0400 2011:
> Apologies - I meant to CC in the list but forgot.
>
> I have gone through and changed all the related functions except ``update_attstats''.
>
> Do you have any advice of how to handle the inner loops, such as those initializing ``stakindN''. The entries before can be handled just like in this patch, by using the symbolic constants.

Based on Tom's comments, I'd submit the patch without that bit, at least
as a first step.

> Again, this is based on master and all existing tests pass.

Please post the patch and add it here:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=10

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2011-06-14 14:25:09 Re: WIP: collect frequency statistics for arrays
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2011-06-14 13:38:02 Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY