Re: pg_listener table errors with slony

On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 09:58 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> Hi Guillaume
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > Le 19/01/2011 22:33, Dave Page a écrit :
> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> >> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> >>> We had 1.2 support. To have 2.0, we would have to get rid of the
> >>> sl_trigger checks. Or was it dropped along the way of 2.0?
> >>
> >> No idea - I just recall Sachin working on compatibility, and that was
> >> one of/the patch he came of with.
> >>
> >
> > Yeah, you're right. I now see the commit. Which means we have two bugs
> > on 2.0 support.
>
> What happened with this in the end? I've just run into the pg_listener
> bug again. I see from the thread you said you were going to work on
> it, but then we got side-tracked into a discussion on whether we
> should have slony support at all.
>

I still have it on my todo list.

--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com