From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID |
Date: | 2011-05-31 16:48:02 |
Message-ID: | 1306860411-sup-5587@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mar may 31 12:39:48 -0400 2011:
> Excerpts from Jaime Casanova's message of mar may 31 12:24:09 -0400 2011:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> > <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > > This patch allows you to initially declare a CHECK constraint as NOT
> > > VALID
> >
> > seems you forgot to add the patch itself
>
> oops ... another bug in my email client, it seems.
Hmm, found an inconsistency in the way recursion is handled -- other
commands have a AT_DoFooRecurse case. Weird. I'll change this to be
like that, though I don't readily see why we do it that way.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-05-31 16:59:33 | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-05-31 16:41:59 | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |