Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Mailing Lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-31 08:12:43
Message-ID: 1306829563.6396.6.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2011-05-30 at 21:52 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I have used RT and I found that the
> web interface was both difficult to use and unwieldly for tickets
> containing large numbers of messages. Maybe those those things have
> been improved, but frankly if RT or Bugzilla is the best we can come
> up with then I'd rather not have a bug tracker at all.

Given that you have been one of the people calling for a bug tracker,
and these are the two most widely used systems available, what's wrong
with them and what else would you suggest?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomasz Chmielewski 2011-05-31 08:26:58 Re: 'SGT DETAIL: Could not open file "pg_clog/05DC": No such file or directory' - what to do now?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-05-31 08:10:48 Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project