| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |
| Date: | 2011-05-30 20:12:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1306786370.5323.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On sön, 2011-05-29 at 11:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> If it has only a partial view of the set of bugs being worked on, it's
> not going to meet the goals that are being claimed for it.
>
> I don't doubt that somebody could run around and link every discussion
> about a bug into the tracker. I'm just dubious that that actually
> *will* happen with enough reliability to make the tracker more useful
> than a mailing-list search.
At least initially, the bug tracker is for those who want to use it, to
help with their work. If it eventually becomes the total-awareness
tool, that would be great, but if we make that the main goal, it will
never get started.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-05-30 20:19:22 | Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-05-30 19:01:21 | Re: SSI predicate locking on heap -- tuple or row? |