From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org |
Cc: | matthew green <mrg(at)eterna(dot)com(dot)au>, ivan <ivan(at)420(dot)am>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] |
Date: | 2001-04-04 23:20:33 |
Message-ID: | 13065.986426433@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> Anyone have suggestions for Mathew?
>> for postgresql-7.1RC2.tar.gz, here is my `make check' for NetBSD/sparc64:
>> digging into the regression.diffs, i can see that:
>> - reltime failed because it just had:
>> ! psql: Backend startup failed
The postmaster log file should have more info, but a first thought is
that you ran up against process or swap-space limitations. The parallel
check has fifty-odd processes going at its peak, which is more than the
default per-user process limit on many Unixen.
>> - inherit fails because the ordering is invalid, eg:
Ordering issues are not really bugs (cf documentation about interpreting
regression results), although it'd be interesting to know if these diffs
still occur after you resolve the other failures.
>> - create_index failed because of some weird error that may
>> have more to do with the quick-n-dirty installation i have
>> on the SS20 i'm doing the test on:
>>
>> CREATE INDEX hash_i4_index ON hash_i4_heap USING hash (random int4_ops);
>> + ERROR: cannot read block 3 of hash_i4_index: Bad address
"Bad address"? That seems pretty bizarre.
>> i will be reinstalling this SS20 with a full installation sometime in
>> the next few days. i will re-run the testsuite after this to see if
>> that is causing any of the lossage.
Please let us know.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mathijs Brands | 2001-04-04 23:20:35 | Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-04-04 23:11:41 | Re: Re: All's quiet ... RC3 packaging ... |