Re: inconvenient compression options in pg_basebackup

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: inconvenient compression options in pg_basebackup
Date: 2011-05-24 18:40:35
Message-ID: 1306262435.14693.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On sön, 2011-05-22 at 16:43 -0400, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 17:45, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > On fre, 2011-05-20 at 14:19 -0400, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> > I suggest we add an argument-less option -z that means "compress",
> >> and
> >> > then -Z can be relegated to choosing the compression level.
> >>
> >> We can't just use -Z without a parameter for that?
> >
> > You can't portably have a command-line option with an optional argument.
>
> Ugh.
>
> In that case, I'm fine with your suggestion.

Quick patch for verification. I chose the naming -z/--gzip to mirror
GNU tar.

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_basebackup-compress.patch text/x-patch 5.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-05-24 18:48:36 Re: Adding an example for replication configuration to pg_hba.conf
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-24 18:40:17 Re: Alignment padding bytes in arrays vs the planner