Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date: 2020-09-15 16:08:43
Message-ID: 1306234.1600186123@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:48 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Sure. Will backporting either patch into REL_13_STABLE now interfere
>>> with RC1 release in any way?

> It is okay to skip RC1 and commit the patch/patches for 13 itself.
> Please wait until after Tom has pushed the rc1 tag. This will probably
> happen tomorrow.

I plan to tag rc1 in around six hours, ~2200UTC today, barring
trouble reports from packagers (none so far). Feel free to push your
patch once the tag appears.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2020-09-15 16:10:08 PostgreSQL 13 RC 1 release announcement draft
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-09-15 16:05:43 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft