Re: [Pgbuildfarm-members] [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] buildfarm notifications]

Michael Glaesemann said:
>
> On Jun 20, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>> Kris Jurka said:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> [let's get all members green]
>>>>
>>>
>>> It might help to publish contact information for machines. Suppose a
>>> developer sees a failure, he can't do anything. He just has to
>>> assume
>>> the owner has noticed it and is working on fixing it. He cannot help
>>> debug it or offer additional insight into the problem.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I originally left out publishing the addresses because of privacy /
>> spam
>> concerns. I'm happy to revisit that design decision. Unless someone
>> objects
>> within the next week I'll work on that.
>
> Instead of publishing the email addresses directly, perhaps a simple
> form to forward a message to the owner? Then the owner can contact
> the interested party directly. Gives the owner a bit more control
> over the propagation of their contact info.
>

If that's what you want it will have to wait - I have a couple of plperl
tasks that I want to get done by Feature Freeze, and I suspect won't get
done unless I do them.

Honestly, I suspect everyone on this list has their contact info
sufficiently spread around that it won't get any benefit from being hidden.
Just posting on the -hackers list is enough, especially with the list being
mirrored to news.

cheers

andrew