From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Prefered Types |
Date: | 2011-05-11 22:05:27 |
Message-ID: | 1305151322-sup-5881@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of dom may 08 23:00:27 -0400 2011:
> For
> example, if you start noticing an occasional integer overflow that
> didn't happen before, it might be pretty darn difficult to figure out
> that the problem is that an operation that was formerly resolved as int4
> + int4 is now resolved as int2 + int2.
About this particular example, I mentioned earlier that I preliminarly
consider the idea of changing the +(int2,int2) operator to return int4
instead of the current int2. It's not impossible that we will miss
changing some operators, but my hope is that it won't be that horrible.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-05-11 22:17:07 | Re: XML with invalid chars |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-05-11 22:00:02 | Re: performance-test farm |