| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Date: | 2011-05-08 12:48:30 |
| Message-ID: | 1304858910.24744.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On sön, 2011-05-08 at 07:21 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> As I said there: "to see how the libraries are configured, for example."
>
> Just the other day I wanted to know what compilation options had been
> used for a particular installation. pg_config wasn't installed because
> the -devel package wasn't installed, and it would have saved me quite
> some time if pg_config had been available.
>
> Another example is to find out what the installation is using for
> shares, the service directory and so on.
Yeah, those are decent reasons.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | lee Richard | 2011-05-08 13:31:26 | Re: Questions about the internal of fastpath function call |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-05-08 12:32:42 | Re: Questions about the internal of fastpath function call |