| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Date: | 2011-05-08 09:24:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1304846671.24744.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On lör, 2011-05-07 at 17:38 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 05/07/2011 05:26 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On lör, 2011-05-07 at 17:16 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> pg_config is useful quite apart from its use in building things, as was
> >> discussed upthread.
> > Link please.
> >
>
> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-05/msg00275.php>
That thread just asserts that it might be useful, and I responded by
asking for what.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-05-08 11:21:06 | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Previous Message | Jean-Paul Argudo | 2011-05-08 09:07:30 | Re: New Canadian nonprofit for trademark, postgresql.org domain, etc. |