| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |
| Date: | 2011-05-07 21:32:41 |
| Message-ID: | 1304803961.15989.26.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On lör, 2011-05-07 at 17:06 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> The repmgr program we distribute has the same problem, so I've been
> getting first-hand reports of just how many people are likely to run
> into this recently. You have to install postgresql-devel with RPM and
> on Debian, the very non-obvious postgresql-server-dev-$version
I'm pretty sure that for installing modules that need compilation from
CPAN or PyPI, you will need the corresponding p*-dev* package installed.
Nothing new here. I don't think you will get distributors to abandon
the concept of -dev(el) packages for this. Just saying.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Leonardo Sápiras | 2011-05-07 21:35:58 | Re: GSoC 2011 - New phpPgAdmin Plugin Architecture |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-05-07 21:26:56 | Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? |