Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(dot)berkus(at)pgexperts(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Date: 2011-05-07 16:42:41
Message-ID: 1304786561.15989.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2011-05-06 at 14:32 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> Given the other improvements in being able to build extensions in 9.1,
> we really should push packagers to move pg_config from the PostgreSQL
> development package into the main one starting in that version. I've
> gotten bit by this plenty of times.

Do you need pg_config to install extensions?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2011-05-07 16:56:02 Re: a bit more precise MaxOffsetNumber
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-05-07 16:41:29 Re: Backpatching of "Teach the regular expression functions to do case-insensitive matching"