Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters

From: Jorgen <jrm(at)kms(dot)dk>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters
Date: 2011-05-03 08:16:16
Message-ID: 1304410576050-4366664.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

>It's probably not a good idea to choose your clustering technology
>based on the web interfaces... Running 3 pgpooladmin doesn't seem like
>a huge thing.

No - our choice will be made based on the performance of the cluster, the
scalability and finally the amount of work involved in configuration,
upgrading and administration.

Jørgen Münster-Swendsen
www.kms.dk

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/pgpoolAdmin-handling-several-pgpool-II-clusters-tp4358647p4366664.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sethu Prasad 2011-05-03 09:02:59 Postgres 9.0.4 + Hot Standby + FusionIO Drive + Performance => Query failed ERROR: catalog is missing 1 attribute(s) for relid 172226
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-05-03 07:29:11 Re: pgpoolAdmin handling several pgpool-II clusters