Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
Date: 2011-04-25 21:10:38
Message-ID: 1303765838.5006.66.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2011-04-25 at 15:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, it's not just to be "helpful", it's to close off code paths that
> are never going to be sufficiently well-tested to not have bizarre
> failure modes. That helps both developers (who don't have to worry
> about testing/fixing such code paths) and users (who won't have to
> deal with the bizarre failure modes).

That's of course another good reason.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darren Duncan 2011-04-25 21:28:50 Re: "stored procedures" - use cases?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-04-25 21:08:16 Re: wrong hint message for ALTER FOREIGN TABLE