Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unfriendly handling of pg_hba SSL options with SSL off
Date: 2011-04-25 18:50:28
Message-ID: 1303757428.5006.58.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2011-04-25 at 14:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In the particular case at hand, if someone is trying to use the same
> hostssl-containing pg_hba.conf across multiple systems, is it not
> reasonable to suppose that he should have SSL turned on in
> postgresql.conf on all those systems? If he doesn't, it's far more
> likely to be a configuration mistake that he'd appreciate being pointed
> out to him, instead of having to reverse-engineer why some of the
> systems aren't working like others.

I think, people use and configure PostgreSQL in all kinds of ways, so we
shouldn't assume what they might be thinking. Especially if an
artificial boundary has the single purpose of being "helpful". If
people want their configuration checked for "sanity" (by someone's
definition), there might be logging or debugging options in order for
that.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-04-25 19:00:08 Re: branching for 9.2devel
Previous Message Greg Stark 2011-04-25 18:43:22 Re: branching for 9.2devel