Re: "stored procedures"

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "stored procedures"
Date: 2011-04-22 18:28:20
Message-ID: 1303496900.7997.14.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2011-04-22 at 08:37 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> It wouldn't bother me in the lest that if in plpgsql procedures if you
> had to set up and tear down a transaction on every line.

It would probably be more reasonable and feasible to have a setup where
you can end a transaction in plpgsql but a new one would start right
away.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2011-04-22 20:21:59 Re: "stored procedures"
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-04-22 16:57:22 Re: "stored procedures"