Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, andrew <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, cbbrowne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, greg <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers
Date: 2011-04-21 15:04:01
Message-ID: 1303398241.9126.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:01 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> We should be encouraging people to spend more time on more useful
> features, not an endless stream of trivial patches, integration and
> release processes.

Hence the proposal to cut that time down and make it count better.

Which direction were you thinking?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-04-21 15:04:31 Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-21 14:47:20 Re: Defining input function for new datatype