"Hitoshi Harada" <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I agree I need to work on that. Also from the spec, "RESPECT NULLS /
> IGNORE NULLS" may be specified but not supported yet. This syntax
> specification is out of the postgres general function call so I wonder
> if those functions are treated specially or not.
Egad, the SQL committee has certainly been taken over by creeping
COBOL-itis when it comes to inventing random new syntax ...
regards, tom lane