| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: MVCC snapshot timing |
| Date: | 2013-11-11 20:39:45 |
| Message-ID: | 13024.1384202385@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I received a private email report that our introductory MVCC
> documentation is unclear about when a snapshot is taken. I have
> adjusted the wording in the attached patch to be less precise about
> snapshot timing. Snapshot timing is controlled by the session isolation
> level, which I don't think we want to cover in this introductory
> paragraph.
I'm not really seeing the point of s/transaction/session/ here.
The phrasing is a bit awkward and maybe could be improved, but I think you
should keep it referring to transactions.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-11-11 20:58:33 | Re: MVCC snapshot timing |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-11-11 17:57:37 | MVCC snapshot timing |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-11-11 20:46:59 | subquery q2 does not have attribute 0 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-11 20:36:56 | Re: Add %z support to elog/ereport? |