From: | Shianmiin <Shianmiin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL backend process high memory usage issue |
Date: | 2011-04-08 22:07:43 |
Message-ID: | 1302300463012-4292010.post@n5.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
Merlin Moncure-2 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Shianmiin <Shianmiin(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>> Further clarification,
>>
>> if I run two concurrent threads
>>
>> pgbench memoryusagetest -c 2 -j 2 -T180 -f test.sql
>>
>> both backend processes uses 1.5GB and result in 3GB in total.
>
> yes. could you please post a capture of top after running the modified
> test that does not run in single transaction.
>
> merlin
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
Here you are.
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/file/n4292010/PostgreSQLBackendMemoryUsage.gif
PostgreSQLBackendMemoryUsage.gif
The screen shot was taken with running the following command
pgbench memoryusagetest -c 2 -j 2 -T1800 -f test.sql
I have to set the test time longer so that I got the chance to take the
snapshot because if pgbench finishes, the connection will be gone.
The snapshot was taken when I wait until the memory usage stable at 1.5GB.
Please note in this tests, there are two PostgreSQL backend processes, each
use 1.5GB of memory.
Samuel
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/PostgreSQL-backend-process-high-memory-usage-issue-tp4289407p4292010.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Lyons | 2011-04-08 22:47:32 | BUG #5969: ecpg can't see sqlca |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-04-08 21:27:04 | Re: PostgreSQL backend process high memory usage issue |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | momjian | 2011-04-08 22:29:24 | Critical fix for pg_upgrade/pg_migrator users |
Previous Message | Clemens Eisserer | 2011-04-08 21:44:21 | Howto sort the result of UNION (without modifying its type)? |