Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthew Draper <matthew(at)trebex(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Allow SQL-language functions to reference parameters by parameter name
Date: 2011-04-05 17:45:28
Message-ID: 1302025528.27487.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2011-04-05 at 11:21 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> +1 on using $foo. Even with the standardization risk I think it's the
> best choice. Prefer $"foo" to ${foo} though.

What standardization risk? The standard has already existed for >10
years and is widely implemented.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-04-05 17:57:40 Re: small fix for Windows build
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-04-05 17:44:12 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Support comments on FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER and SERVER objects.