From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and log file output on Windows |
Date: | 2011-07-19 05:08:46 |
Message-ID: | 13020.69.193.211.209.1311052126.squirrel@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, July 18, 2011 11:28 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Has anyone successfully used pg_upgrade 9.0 with -l (log) on Windows?
>
> I received a private email bug report that pg_upgrade 9.0 does not work
> with the -l/log option on Windows. The error is:
>
> Analyzing all rows in the new cluster
> ""c:/MinGW/msys/1.0/home/edb/inst/bin/vacuumdb" --port 55445 --username
> "edb" --all --analyze
> >> c:/MinGW/msys/1.0/home/edb/auxschedule/test.log 2>&1"
> The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another
> process.
>
> What has me confused is this same code exists in pg_migrator, which was
> fixed to work with -l on Windows by Hiroshi Saito with this change:
>
> /*
> * On Win32, we can't send both server output and pg_ctl output
> * to the same file because we get the error:
> * "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by
> another process."
> * so we have to send pg_ctl output to 'nul'.
> */
> sprintf(cmd, SYSTEMQUOTE "\"%s/pg_ctl\" -l \"%s\" -D \"%s\" "
> "-o \"-p %d -c autovacuum=off -c
> autovacuum_freeze_max_age=2000000000\" "
> "start >> \"%s\" 2>&1" SYSTEMQUOTE,
> bindir, ctx->logfile, datadir, port,
> #ifndef WIN32
> ctx->logfile);
> #else
> DEVNULL);
> #endif
>
> The fix was not to use the same log file and output file for pg_ctl.
> But as you can see, the pg_ctl and vacuumdb code is unchanged:
>
> prep_status(ctx, "Analyzing all rows in the new cluster");
> exec_prog(ctx, true,
> SYSTEMQUOTE "\"%s/vacuumdb\" --port %d --username \"%s\" "
> "--all --analyze >> %s 2>&1" SYSTEMQUOTE,
> ctx->new.bindir, ctx->new.port, ctx->user, ctx->logfile);
>
> I can't figure out of there is something odd about this user's setup or
> if there is a bug in pg_upgrade with -l on Windows.
>
The Windows file system seems to have some asynchronicity regarding what
files are locked. For that reason, the buildfarm code has long had a
couple of "sleep(5)" calls where it calls pg_ctl. You might benefit from
doing something similar.
cheers
andrew.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-07-19 05:24:15 | Re: proposal: a validator for configuration files |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2011-07-19 04:41:04 | Re: Commitfest Status: Sudden Death Overtime |