From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19 |
Date: | 2011-03-18 18:55:14 |
Message-ID: | 1300474501-sup-980@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie mar 18 14:25:16 -0300 2011:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > SyncRepUpdateSyncStandbysDefined() is added into walwriter, which means
> > waiters won't be released if we do a sighup during a fast shutdown,
> > since the walwriter gets killed as soon as that starts. I'm thinking
> > bgwriter should handle that now.
>
> Hmm. I was thinking that doing it in WAL writer would make it more
> responsive, but since this is a fairly unlikely scenario, it's
> probably not worth complicating the shutdown sequence to do it the way
> I did. I'll move it to bgwriter.
Can't they both do it?
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Wanner | 2011-03-18 19:17:56 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. |
Previous Message | Dan Ports | 2011-03-18 18:18:32 | Re: SSI bug? |