Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases
Date: 2016-03-31 21:59:52
Message-ID: 13004.1459461592@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
> I just noticed that the release notes mention char(n) as affected.
> That's not actually true, because char(n) SortSupport only came in
> 9.6. The Wiki page now shows this, which may be the most important
> place, but ideally we'd fix this in the release notes. I guess it's
> too late.

Well, too late for 9.5.2 anyway. It still makes sense to correct that
text for future releases. I'm inclined to wait a little bit though and
see what other improvements become apparent. For instance, I think the
point about non-first index columns not being affected is of greater
weight than you seem to place on it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-31 22:05:38 Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-31 21:28:30 Re: Draft release notes for next week's releases