Re: FuncExpr.collid/OpExpr.collid unworkably serving double duty

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: FuncExpr.collid/OpExpr.collid unworkably serving double duty
Date: 2011-03-15 20:22:43
Message-ID: 1300220563.7581.35.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2011-03-15 at 16:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> But what did you think of the idea of setting collations during a
> post-pass, so that the collation derivation values need only be local
> storage during that one recursive routine?

That sounds reasonable. We do need the collation value in the
expression tree permanently, but not the collation derivation, as far as
I can tell.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2011-03-15 23:04:28 Re: dependency between numbers keywords and parser speed
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-03-15 20:19:30 Re: Can't specify default collation?