Re: Macros for time magic values

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Macros for time magic values
Date: 2011-03-14 14:50:00
Message-ID: 1300114200.1790.11328.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 10:42 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 22:29 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > On fre, 2011-03-11 at 12:50 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > It has bothered me that many of our time routines use special magic
> > > > constants for time values, e.g. 24, 12, 60, etc.
> > > >
> > > > The attached patch changes these magic constants to macros to clarify
> > > > the code. I would like to apply this for 9.1 as a cleanup.
> > >
> > > I think it's much clearer with the plain numbers.
> >
> > Yeh. It's not like the values 24, 12 or 60 were going to change.
>
> Well, I find the macro names clearer because it removes domain-specific
> knowledge from code that is already complex, e.g '24' represents what?
> It is similar to the argument of why use C when you can use assembler.
> I find the macros a pure code clarity win. If most people don't we
> should remove them consistently.

PGSQL_EMOTION_GOOD_ARGUMENT

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-03-14 14:57:44 Re: Better estimates of index correlation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-03-14 14:42:46 Re: Macros for time magic values