Re: Alternative to serial primary key

From: "David Clarke" <pigwin32(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Markus Schaber" <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Alternative to serial primary key
Date: 2006-07-06 11:06:09
Message-ID: 12b7ac1e0607060406r16d03f74mfa303eec9ab4821f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On 7/6/06, Markus Schaber <schabi(at)logix-tt(dot)com> wrote:
> This is a good idea if you want to have taller indices, but you still
> need to re-check the "real" key due to hash collisions.

I am aware there are collisions with md5 but without any actual proof
I believe the risk to be very low with the data I'm storing which is a
kind of scrubbed free form residential address.

>
> If you've plenty of time to spend, you could also bring the hash index
> type back to life, which is currently deprecated according to the
> PostgreSQL docs...

Unfortunately with the meagre time I have available, the only dent I'm
likely to make is in the wall with my head.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schaber 2006-07-06 11:10:55 Re: Alternative to serial primary key
Previous Message Markus Schaber 2006-07-06 10:46:52 Re: Alternative to serial primary key