| From: | Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pl/python do not delete function arguments |
| Date: | 2011-02-26 08:43:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1298709792.9591.8.camel@Nokia-N900-42-11 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
----- Original message -----
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>
> wrote:
> > On 15/02/11 20:39, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > On tis, 2011-02-15 at 09:58 +0100, Jan Urbański wrote:
> > > > [a bug that we don't know how to fix]
> From this discussion I gather that we have a problem here that we
> don't exactly know how to fix, so I'm inclined to suggest that we mark
> this Returned with Feedback in the CommitFest and instead add it to
> the TODO. Since this is a pre-existing bug and not a new regression,
> it should not be something we hold up beta for.
I'm officially at a loss on how to fix that bug without some serious gutting of how PL/Python arguments work. If someone comes up with a brilliant way to solve this problem, we can commit it after beta, or even during the 9.2 cycle (should the brilliant solution be backpatcheable).
Jan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz | 2011-02-26 09:33:14 | Re: WIP: cross column correlation ... |
| Previous Message | Jan Urbański | 2011-02-26 08:38:31 | Re: pl/python explicit subtransactions |