Re: disposition of remaining patches

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: disposition of remaining patches
Date: 2011-02-23 18:34:32
Message-ID: 1298485977-sup-7411@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié feb 23 15:14:04 -0300 2011:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié feb 23 14:54:02 -0300 2011:
> >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >> > 16. synchronized snapshots.  Alvaro is working on this one.
> >>
> >> Lots of discussion of this one, but current status is not clear to me.
> >>  Alvaro, are you working on this actively?
> >
> > I am.  I'm not sure if it's still reasonable to get into 9.1, given that
> > it needs to be rewritten from almost completely from scratch.
>
> Well, if it gets punted, I won't be too sad, since the pg_dump patch
> to actually use this functionality for something useful already got
> pushed off.

Oh, I thought that patch was committed which is why I was in a bit of a
hurry. I will mark this one "returned with feedback" too, then.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-02-23 18:42:45 Re: How to extract a value from a record using attnum or attname?
Previous Message Radosław Smogura 2011-02-23 18:18:22 Re: Binary in/out for aclitem