From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: disposition of remaining patches |
Date: | 2011-02-23 18:34:32 |
Message-ID: | 1298485977-sup-7411@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié feb 23 15:14:04 -0300 2011:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié feb 23 14:54:02 -0300 2011:
> >> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >> > 16. synchronized snapshots. Alvaro is working on this one.
> >>
> >> Lots of discussion of this one, but current status is not clear to me.
> >> Alvaro, are you working on this actively?
> >
> > I am. I'm not sure if it's still reasonable to get into 9.1, given that
> > it needs to be rewritten from almost completely from scratch.
>
> Well, if it gets punted, I won't be too sad, since the pg_dump patch
> to actually use this functionality for something useful already got
> pushed off.
Oh, I thought that patch was committed which is why I was in a bit of a
hurry. I will mark this one "returned with feedback" too, then.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-02-23 18:42:45 | Re: How to extract a value from a record using attnum or attname? |
Previous Message | Radosław Smogura | 2011-02-23 18:18:22 | Re: Binary in/out for aclitem |