Re: why two dashes in extension load files

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why two dashes in extension load files
Date: 2011-02-17 14:02:57
Message-ID: 1297951377.31633.6.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2011-02-15 at 15:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I can't claim close familiarity with Debian's conventions in this
> matter, but I do know about RPM's, and I'm uneager to duplicate that
> silliness. Magic conversion of dots to underscores (sometimes),
> complete inability to determine which part of the package filename is
> which without external knowledge, etc.

FYI, the system in Debian is that '_' separate package name and version,
and '_' is not allowed in package name or version. I guess since we
want to allow both '_' and '-' in package names, we can't really do that
or anything similar.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-02-17 14:37:39 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix blatantly uninitialized variable in recent commit.
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-02-17 13:59:23 Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3